The conflict in Iraq is more than just a thorn in the side of our country, it is a struggle in the soul and moral conscience of our nation. We have been faced with what may be the most intractible question of our century. As a democracy, we are a community that debates issues and takes sides. But I think we perhaps go too far: we pick a corner (hawk or dove) and defend our points vigorously...but we would be better served to keep questioning the issues, and our stance on them. We learn more by considering the arguments of our opponent, than by debating them.

Some questions to consider:

Is this a conflict that can be won by force?

What are the conditions that we will leave Iraq?

What would become of the millions of western-supporting Iraquis if we left?

What would become of the Christians in Iraq if we left?

Is this a conflict that can be won by the military? If not, what is the purpose of the military?

Is this a conflict that can be won at all?

How do we define success?

At what point would we say the cost is not worth it?

If we leave, what will fill the vacuum?

If we left, could the militant radicals build a government, or are they merely agents of chaos and intimidation?

Sadam Hussein was able to keep them at bay with an iron fist. Could another strong ruler/tyrant (i.e. another Sadam Hussein) fill in that void?

If we had to choose, what would be worse - tyrrany or chaos?

Is there anything that would be worth the ongoing cost of American blood? Is there anything our generation feels that strong about?

How many Iraquis lives are worth one American life?

Tough questions...